During Covid -19 Farahi Law Firm, APC Gives you the ” Medical Treatment You Need, Money You Deserve ” Contact us Today for Free Case Consultation Available 24/7
Amazon damage product

Amazon May Face Legal Charges in California for Injuries Caused by Defective Products Sold in its Platform

Amazon, the e-commerce giant, may be held responsible for the injuries and damages caused by the defective products sold in its platform. This was concluded by a court of appeals in California the past August 13th.

The California Court of Appeal’s Fourth Appellate District settled this after revising the case of Angela Bolger, a woman who suffered burns in her legs and arms when the battery for her laptop, which she bought through a third party on Amazon, exploded while she was using it.

Amazon damage product

It should be said that the California Court of Appeals’ decision opens the door for Amazon to face legal charges in other states for the damages caused by the defective products that are sold in its platform. Currently, Pennsylvania and Ohio are analyzing the matter, while the Federal Courts of Appeals review cases under the laws of California and Texas.

Amazon, the e-commerce giant, may be held responsible for the injuries and damages caused by the defective products sold in its platform. This was concluded by the Court of Appeals in California last August 13.

The California Court of Appeals’ Fourth Appellate District settled this after revising the case of Angela Bolger, a woman who suffered burns in her legs and arms when the battery for her laptop, which she bought through a third party on Amazon, exploded while she was using it.

It should be said that the California Court of Appeals’ decision opens the door for Amazon to face legal charges in other states for the damages caused by the defective products that are sold in its platform. Currently, Pennsylvania and Ohio are analyzing the matter, while the Federal Courts of Appeals review cases under the laws of California and Texas.

Amazon damage product

The Leading Case

Angela Bolger bought a battery for her laptop from the seller Lenoge Technology HK Ltd, on Amazon. The battery exploded months later while she was using the computer on her thighs, provoking her third-degree burns on her arms, legs, and feet.

After the incident, Bolger demanded Lenoge and Amazon for her injuries. However, the Supreme Court of San Diego decided the e-commerce giant was not liable for the incident, because it acted only as a service provider.

Unhappy with the decision, Bolger brought the case to the Court of Appeals, where it was determined that Amazon could not protect itself from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. According to the said section, online platforms cannot be considered responsible for the content posted by users.

According to the Court, the Act couldn’t be applied in this case, as the liability depends on theown activities of Amazon, not of its condition as speaker or editor of the content given by Lenoge for its list of products.”

It is worth mentioning that Lenoge Technology HK Ltd, the battery seller, is part of the “Amazon Fulfilled” program, in which suppliers ship their products to Amazon warehouses, as Amazon is in charge of shipping the products to the buyer.

In this program, Amazon controls the packing for shipping. The clients that return products ship their products to the e-commerce company instead of to the seller. To participate in this program, the suppliers must pay additionals fees.

 “Amazon set the terms of its relationship with Lenoge, controlled the conditions of Lenoge’s offer for sale on Amazon, limited Lenoge’s access to Amazon’s customer information, forced Lenoge to communicate with customers through Amazon, and demanded indemnification as well as substantial fees on each purchase,” the Court of Appeals claimed.

According to the Court of Appeals, it doesn’t matter the term we use to describe Amazon, whether it’s ‘retailer,’ ‘distributor,’ or merely ‘facilitator,’ as Amazon was pivotal in bringing the product from the seller to the consumer.

Lenoge, who was listed in Amazon as “E-Life,” was also demanded by Bolger but never appeared at the trial. Due to this, a court of first instance issued a default judgment against the company.

Even though this is the first time Amazon faces charges of liability, the Court of Appeals’ Fourth Appellate District ruling takes place when California lawmakers discuss legislation that could put Amazon and other e-commerce operators under strict liability law.

If you have suffered an injury caused by a defective product, remember that in Farahi Law Firm, we have specialized attorneys that will help you. We are available 24/7 to answer your questions. Call us at (844) 244-2955 for a free evaluation of your case.

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Blogs

Our Clients Testimonials

Personal Injury Lawyers
Personal Injury Lawyers
Personal Injury Lawyers

Farahi Law Firm, APC Locations

5340 Alla Road
Suite 140
Los Angeles, California 90066
(310) 601-4925

22760 Hawthorne Boulevard
Suite #230
Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 620-9791

1010 Crenshaw Blvd.,
Suite 100
Torrance, CA 90501
(310) 554-8347

14500 Roscoe Blvd 4th Floor, Panorama City, CA 91402
(818) 949-1881

222 West 6th Street,
San Pedro, CA 90731
(310) 744-8015

4900 California Ave
Second Floor
Bakersfield , CA 93309
(661) 403-4243